From: Fred Ingham (fingham@cox.net)
Date: Thu Aug 07 2003 - 16:51:32 GMT-3
!!!!
Some examples apply it as a matter of course but it isn't necessary. A good
explanation is in:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/prodlit/dlsw4_rg.htm
Cheers, Fred
----- Original Message -----
From: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
To: "Group Study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:05 AM
Subject: DLSW in mixed ethernet & Token Ring environments
> Hi group,
>
> Ist of all, I know T/R is no longer on the lab, but I want to understand
when
> to use the [lf frame size] option in the dlsw remote-peer and dlsw
local-peer
> commands.
>
> I'm doing a practice lab which includes both ethernet and token ring (my
lab
> doesn't have any token ring so I can't confirm this).
>
> In the solution configs, it includes the following dlsw commands:
>
> dlsw local-peer peer-id x.x.x.x lf 1500
> dlsw remote-peer # tcp x.x.x.x lf 1500
>
> Questions:
>
> If the local peer has only ethernet interfaces participating in dlsw does
it
> need the lf frame size option?
>
> When is the lf frame size option needed on the remote-peer command?
>
> Thanks in advance, dt
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:53:55 GMT-3