RE: Is this true reg Cat 3550 and Traffic Shaping

From: Jonathan V Hays (jhays@jtan.com)
Date: Sat Aug 02 2003 - 15:49:28 GMT-3

• Next message: Jonathan V Hays: "RE: Privilege level commands"
• Previous message: Jonathan V Hays: "RE: spanning-tree and port priority"
• Maybe in reply to: Ajit: "Is this true reg Cat 3550 and Traffic Shaping"
• Next in thread: iron_tri: "Re: Is this true reg Cat 3550 and Traffic Shaping"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Probably. ;-) There doesn't seem to be any discussion about traffic
shaping in the 3550 software config guide QoS chapter.

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c3550/12114ea1/3550s
cg/swqos.htm

What is the source of your quotation?

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Ajit
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 2:31 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Is this true reg Cat 3550 and Traffic Shaping

" .....The Catalyst 3550 supports policing for both incoming and
outgoing directions. Traffic shaping is not supported ...."
___________________________
Ajit Andrew Mohanraj.
Bangalore, INDIA.
email : ajitmohanraj@vsnl.com
Mobile :91-80-56794795
Phone : 91-80-5462457

• Next message: Jonathan V Hays: "RE: Privilege level commands"
• Previous message: Jonathan V Hays: "RE: spanning-tree and port priority"
• Maybe in reply to: Ajit: "Is this true reg Cat 3550 and Traffic Shaping"
• Next in thread: iron_tri: "Re: Is this true reg Cat 3550 and Traffic Shaping"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:53:52 GMT-3