From: Brian Dennis (bdennis@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Thu Jul 31 2003 - 20:21:02 GMT-3
Jason,
The router itself does not run a RIPv1 or RIPv2 "process". The RIP
version commands relate to the updates that the router can send and/or
receive.
The default behavior for a Cisco router is to send RIPv1 and receive
RIPv1 and RIPv2. This can be changed by using the "version 1|2" router
configuration command which will affect the version sent and received on
all interfaces. If you want a particular interface to send or receive a
different version of RIP you can use the "ip rip send version [1] [2]"
or the "ip rip receive version [1] [2]" interface commands. The version
configured under the interface will override the version specified in
the router configuration mode.
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Jason Cash
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 3:24 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RIP - send version 2
I was doing a scenario today and it called for RIP b/w two neighbors in
the
153.1.61.0 /28 networks. It instructed the 'Version 2' could not be
used on
the route process. However, the solution had 'ip rip send version 2' in
it's serial interface. In looking up on the DOC CD, I found this:
version
To specify a Routing Information Protocol (RIP) version used globally by
the
router, use the version command in router configuration mode. To restore
the
default value, use the no form of this command.
version {1 | 2}
no version
Defaults
The software receives RIP Version 1 and Version 2 packets, but sends
only
Version 1 packets.
My question is this: Is there any difference in have the interface send
Version 2 and the process running Rip 1 or running RIP version 2 alone
which
by default sends version 1 and 2?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:53:00 GMT-3