From: Jonathan V Hays (jhays@jtan.com)
Date: Sun Jul 20 2003 - 22:09:44 GMT-3
I'm guessing the conversion factor is 8 bits/Byte:
27 KiloBytes x 8 bits/Byte = 216 Kilobits
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
badger
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 3:07 PM
To: Connie Nie
Cc: Richard Boover; Jim Phillipo; ccielab@groupstudy.com;
'brian@cyscoexpert.com'; 'Peter'
Subject: Re[4]: QOS CBWFQ to Custom Queuing (again)
Hello Connie,
Sunday, July 20, 2003, 7:50:12 AM, you wrote:
CN> There was a thread about this before. One opinion is that the CBWFQ
CN> bandwidth should (in telnet's example): 14.8%x256x75% ---because the
total
CN> reservable bandwidth by default in CBWFQ is 75% of the bandwidth.
CN> Connie
Still confused, 75% of the original 256k is 192K. So my question
still stands, where did the "8" come from ?
Sometimes I need pictures to help explain 8-)
CN> Jim,
CN> How did you get the "8" in your:
CN> "convert Custom Queuing (KB) to CBWFQ (Kbps): 27KB x 8 = 216Kbps"
-- Best regards, badger mailto:badger@pongo.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:46 GMT-3