From: badger (badger@pongo.org)
Date: Sun Jul 20 2003 - 16:07:24 GMT-3
Hello Connie,
Sunday, July 20, 2003, 7:50:12 AM, you wrote:
CN> There was a thread about this before. One opinion is that the CBWFQ
CN> bandwidth should (in telnet's example): 14.8%x256x75% ---because the total
CN> reservable bandwidth by default in CBWFQ is 75% of the bandwidth.
CN> Connie
Still confused, 75% of the original 256k is 192K. So my question
still stands, where did the "8" come from ?
Sometimes I need pictures to help explain 8-)
CN> Jim,
CN> How did you get the "8" in your:
CN> "convert Custom Queuing (KB) to CBWFQ (Kbps): 27KB x 8 = 216Kbps"
-- Best regards, badger mailto:badger@pongo.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:46 GMT-3