From: beda jain (bpjain@cisco.com)
Date: Wed Jul 16 2003 - 08:11:48 GMT-3
when you apply this in a sub interface then you have to apply it a fram
relay class. when you want to apply in fram relay class then you have to
turn on frame relay trafic shaping other wise you wont see any thing on sh
policy interface. so when you turn on the trafic shaping by default mincir
is half of the cir which is 32k. By degin here bandwidth is calculated from
mincir. so you need to chage the mincir to 256. Or you can go with mohit's
solution by directly puting the bandwidth not the percentage.
There is no problem if you apply the service policy in main interface.
let me if any body disagree on this.
Thanks,
Beda
When you turn on At 01:06 PM 7/16/2003 +0530, Navin Parwal wrote:
>where does mincir come into picture over here , isnt this conversion from cw
>to cbwfq ?
>
>Navin Parwal
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "beda jain" <bpjain@cisco.com>
>To: "SHARMA,MOHIT (HP-Germany,ex1)" <mohit.sharma@hp.com>; "'Cristian Henry
>H'" <chenry@reuna.cl>; "Budi Gunawan" <bgunawan@hotpop.com>
>Cc: "CCIE Lab GroupStudy" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 9:57 PM
>Subject: RE: Converting from Custom Queue to CBWFQ
>
>
> > Hi,
> > when we are configure for bandwidth percentage and applying this to
>frame
> > relay class, then you have to configure frame relay traffic shaping and
> > mincir= 256 here.
> >
> > other wise you won't see anything on sh policy interface cmd.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Beda
> > At 05:17 PM 7/15/2003 +0200, SHARMA,MOHIT (HP-Germany,ex1) wrote:
> > >HI Christian,
> > >
> > >Since in the question they r giving you the bandwith, I would use the
> > >bandwith command, with a max-reserved bandwidth 100
> > >in the interface-
> > >
> > >policy-map qos
> > > class tcp23
> > > bandwith 68
> > > queue-limit 100
> > > class tcp80
> > > bandwith 137
> > > queue-limit 20
> > > class class-default
> > > bandwith 51
> > > queue-limit 100
> > >
> > >Just a thought.
> > >
> > >Smiles,
> > >
> > >Mohit.
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Cristian Henry H [mailto:chenry@reuna.cl]
> > >Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 4:58 PM
> > >To: Budi Gunawan
> > >Cc: CCIE Lab GroupStudy
> > >Subject: Re: Converting from Custom Queue to CBWFQ
> > >
> > >
> > >My solution:
> > >
> > >Total bandwidthis = 256 Kbps
> > >Available bandwith = 256*0.75 = 192 Kbps
> > >
> > >1: 2000/7500 = 26,6 %
> > >2: 1500/7500 = 20,0 %
> > >3: 4000/7500 = 53,3 %
> > >
> > >
> > >class-map tcp23
> > > match group 100
> > >!
> > >class-map tcp80
> > > match group 101
> > >!
> > >policy-map qos
> > > class tcp23
> > > bandwith percent 27
> > > queue-limit 100
> > > class tcp80
> > > bandwith percent 20
> > > queue-limit 20
> > > class class-default
> > > bandwith percent 53
> > > queue-limit 100
> > >!
> > >access-list 100 permit tcp any any eq 23
> > >access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 80
> > >!
> > >
> > >Budi Gunawan ha escrito:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Could you explain to me, how to convert Custom Queue to CBWFQ, with
> > > > assumption bandwidth is 256K and custom queueing is like this :
> > > >
> > > > - queue-list 1 protocol ip 1 tcp 23
> > > > - queue-list 1 protocol ip 2 tcp 80
> > > > - queue-list 1 default 3
> > > > - queue-list 1 queue 1 byte-count 2000 limit 100
> > > > - queue-list 1 queue 3 byte-count 4000 limit 100
> > > >
> > > > Thanks & rgds,
> > > > BG.
> > > >
> > > >
>_______________________________________________________________________
> > > > You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> > > >
> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >--
> > >Cristian E. Henry
> > >REUNA
> > >
> > >E-mail: chenry@reuna.cl
> > >Fono: 56-2-3370336
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________________________________
> > >You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> > >
> > >Subscription information may be found at:
> > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________________________________
> > >You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> > >
> > >Subscription information may be found at:
> > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:41 GMT-3