From: John Smith (c00per_omers1@yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Jul 16 2003 - 09:28:54 GMT-3
Mohit,
Just wondering why you say don't worry about this feature? I don't
remember the exam outline, is it missing from the exam outline? I know
cyscoexpert.com just had a question of the week on load balancing per
packet with hsrp redundancy and cef was part of it.
If it's in the exam outline, I'd worry about, cause you could be asked,
if it's not, I fully agree, don't worry about it.
======================
boby2kusa@hotmail.com wrote:
Don't even worry about this feature.
----- Original Message -----
From: "SHARMA,MOHIT (HP-Germany,ex1)"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 8:04 AM
Subject: CEF recommendations.
> HI All,
>
> Just checked the archives for this.
>
> For CAR,NBAR,policy-propogation via BGP, netflow, ip
unicast RPF, turbo
> ACL's require CAR.
> I also read that the set command in Modular QOS CLI needs
cef.
>
> Without going into the controversy of the above statement
;-)
> WOULD it be SAFE to say that in THE LAB, we SHOULD enable
CEF on ALL THE
> ROUTERS.
> Are there some negative effects?? or a technology which
will not work with
> cef????
>
> Any comments, recommendations will be most Welcome.
>
> Thanx,
>
> Mohit.
>
>
>
_______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S
Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
_______________________________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion
Group.
Subscription information may be found at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:41 GMT-3