From: badger (badger@pongo.org)
Date: Tue Jul 15 2003 - 23:53:50 GMT-3
Hello boby2kusa,
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 9:13:33 AM, you wrote:
bhc> Don't even worry about this feature.
bhc> ----- Original Message -----
bhc> From: "SHARMA,MOHIT (HP-Germany,ex1)" <mohit.sharma@hp.com>
bhc> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
bhc> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 8:04 AM
bhc> Subject: CEF recommendations.
>> HI All,
>>
>> Just checked the archives for this.
>>
>> For CAR,NBAR,policy-propogation via BGP, netflow, ip unicast RPF, turbo
>> ACL's require CAR.
>> I also read that the set command in Modular QOS CLI needs cef.
>>
>> Without going into the controversy of the above statement ;-)
>> WOULD it be SAFE to say that in THE LAB, we SHOULD enable CEF on ALL THE
>> ROUTERS.
>> Are there some negative effects?? or a technology which will not work with
>> cef????
>>
>> Any comments, recommendations will be most Welcome.
>>
>> Thanx,
>>
>> Mohit.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>>
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
bhc> _______________________________________________________________________
bhc> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
bhc> Subscription information may be found at:
bhc> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
I just ran across a scenario in which the "frame-relay de-list n" and
"frame-relay de-group n" combination wouldn't tag the packets as DE
unless cef was turned on.
-- Best regards, badger mailto:badger@pongo.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:41 GMT-3