From: John Matijevic (matijevi@bellsouth.net)
Date: Wed Jul 09 2003 - 14:25:47 GMT-3
Jeongwoo,
I am a little confused about which interfaces and ips are in what protocol
processes. I believe this may have been mentioned earlier, but could you
please post full configs so we can have a better idea of whats going on.
Sincerley,
Matijevic
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Dennis" <brian@labforge.com>
To: "'Badger'" <badger@pongo.org>
Cc: "'Ram Shummoogum'" <rshummoo@ca.ibm.com>; <park@wams.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 1:15 PM
Subject: RE: Gotcha on Redistribute Connected
> How could adding the RIP interfaces to the route-map that is used for
> redistribute connected affect the requirements?
>
> Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Badger
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 9:55 AM
> To: Brian Dennis
> Cc: 'Ram Shummoogum'; park@wams.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Gotcha on Redistribute Connected
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> I tried that too, but it seems that in a lab environtment that that
> solution
> would violate the rule of only placing an interface under the routing
> process
> that is specified in the requirements...I grabbing straws here, because
> I'm
> afraid of losing points on the exam for doig this.
>
>
>
> Quoting Brian Dennis <brian@labforge.com>:
>
> > It still happens in 12.3. The solution is of course to add the
> > interfaces that are running RIP to the route-map that is used for the
> > redistribution of the connected routes.
> >
> > Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > Badger
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 9:14 AM
> > To: Ram Shummoogum
> > Cc: park@wams.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: Gotcha on Redistribute Connected
> >
> > I posted a similar problem "Subject OSPF <-> EIGRP redistribution."
> > I'm
> > experiencing this not only with rip/ospf, but also ospf/eigrp. I have
> > found a
> > cause/reason/solution yet. I use 12.1.5(14)T and plan to just flash
> > 12.2x to
> > see if it fixes the rpoblem.
> >
> >
> > Quoting Ram Shummoogum <rshummoo@ca.ibm.com>:
> >
> > > I don't think you are tripping. I have been observing this too in
> few
> > > ipexpert labs and I always keep any eye on this.
> > >
> > > RAM
> > >
> > >
> > > Jeongwoo Park <jpark@wams.com>@groupstudy.com on 07/09/2003 11:28:26
> > AM
> > >
> > > Please respond to Jeongwoo Park <jpark@wams.com>
> > >
> > > Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > >
> > >
> > > To: lab <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > cc:
> > > Subject: Gotcha on Redistribute Connected
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi, all
> > > Here is the layout where the "redistribute connected" got me.
> > >
> > > R1-----ospf------R2-lo 0
> > > |
> > > rip
> > > |
> > > R3
> > >
> > > What I did was that I redistributed the connected network (loopback
> > > network)
> > > into ospf with route-map only for the loopback network like this.
> > > router ospf 1
> > > router-id 2.2.2.2
> > > log-adjacency-changes
> > > summary-address 170.100.20.0 255.255.255.0
> > > redistribute connected subnets route-map c2o
> > > redistribute rip subnets
> > > network 170.100.124.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> > > !
> > > route-map c2o permit 10
> > > match ip address 1
> > > !
> > > access-list 1 permit 170.100.20.0 0.0.0.7
> > >
> > > Now, I redistribute rip into ospf on R2.
> > >
> > > The problem is that R1 can't see the rip network.
> > >
> > > What I think is the gotcha is that when R2 redistribute "Connected"
> > with
> > > route-map, it filtered the rip network, because the rip network is
> the
> > > connected network as well from the R2's stand point.
> > >
> > > Am I saying right or I am tripping?
> > >
> > > Please let me know what I am doing wrong here.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > JP
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > > You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> > >
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > > You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> > >
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----------------
> > G'day
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------
> > This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> -----------------
> G'day
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:30 GMT-3