From: Emad (emad@zakq8.com)
Date: Fri Jul 04 2003 - 04:16:12 GMT-3
Folks,
This is a point that I didn't discover it from any resource,
In Jeff Doyle (tcp/ip vol 1) page 716 line 4,
When we have a router having some interfaces inside RIP and others
inside IGRP , and one interface as stub network (not stub area) , the
author preferred to put the network of this interface under IGRP not RIP
(why!!?)
As redistribute connected , why specifically under rip ? and what is
wrong if we put it under rip?
Please I need opinion generally putting a rule between any two routing
protocols not these two specifically.
thanx
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:23 GMT-3