Re: CBWFQ and Frame-Relay

From: badger (badger@pongo.org)
Date: Thu Jun 26 2003 - 11:04:29 GMT-3


Hello badger,

Wednesday, June 25, 2003, 8:38:26 PM, you wrote:

b> Hello ccielab,

b> I'm still struggling with a basic issue of how to apply the service
b> policy to a frame interface. I have two scenarios that are still
b> puzzling and welcome anyone to offer up a solution/explanation.

b> The first scenario is on a FR physical interface and the basic two
b> questions here are (1) do you need to turn on "traffic shaping" for the
b> service policy to work (2) are you required to use the "frame-relay
b> map-class xxx
b> service-policy yyy"

b> Or, does the service policy get applied directly to the interface
b> such as "service-policy output yyy"

b> As a side note...it may be my code, 12.1(14)T, but whenever I use the
b> "frame-relay map-class xxx" method, my routers instantly reload!

b> The second scenario is on a FR interface with two point-to-point sub
b> interfaces. Say I want to the same service-policy to be applied to
b> both the sub interfaces, redundant links, then the question(s) are
b> (1) Again, does FR traffic shaping need to be enabled? (2) does the
b> service policy get applied to the physical interface, or to both sub
b> interfaces? (3) Whatever the answer is to (2), do I use the
b> "frame-relay map class" method, or apply the "service-policy output
b> yyy" directly to physical/sub-interface?

b> I have read many docs, books, and examples and seen this accomplished
b> in so many ways that my head is still spinning, but I would really
b> like to get this nailed down.

b> Thanks and

My own followup to post:

If I apply the service policy directly to the physical FR interface,
and do a "sho policy-map interface serx," then I can see my service
policy is applied. However, if I apply the service policy using the
"frame-relay map-class yyy" and then so the sho policy-map interface
Serx, my service policy is no longer applied to the interface.

Is there another show command that will show me that the policy is
applied to my FR interface when using the "frame-relay map-class yyy"
method of applying the policy?

Now to really confuse myself even more, what if I am actually doing
trafiic shaping on the FR interface and also have a CBWFQ policy
map applied under my frame-relay map class? According to the above
"sho" output results, the CBWFQ wont apply.

Thanks, still confused, need help.

-- 
Best regards,
 badger                            mailto:badger@pongo.org


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 04 2003 - 11:11:10 GMT-3