From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Mon Jun 23 2003 - 14:55:10 GMT-3
That would be correct for the original version (RFC1795), however when
later RFC's came out (I think 2114) that changed. Now (prove this with
a sniffer if you are curious) the source port will be a high random port
above 11,000.
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
SHARMA,MOHIT (HP-Germany,ex1)
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 1:33 PM
To: 'Jonathan V Hays'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc: 'Scott Morris'
Subject: RE: RE: Difference between these two ( QoS)
Hi,
DLSW TCP encapsulation is transimiting on port 2065 and does listen on
port 2067.
Smiles,
Mohit.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan V Hays [mailto:jhays@jtan.com]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:27 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc: 'Scott Morris'
Subject: RE: RE: Difference between these two ( QoS)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf Of Scott Morris
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 8:54 AM
> To: polarccie@yahoo.co.uk; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: RE: Difference between these two ( QoS)
>
>
> 2067 isn't really used any longer. 1981 - 1983 are used only if you
> have priority configured on your DLSw peers.
>
> Scott
>
Hmmm. I know I saw a bunch of port 2067 packets the other day in a
"debug ip packet detail". I was doing a practice lab. What commands
might trigger the use of port 2067?
TIA,
Jonathan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 04 2003 - 11:11:07 GMT-3