From: kasturi cisco (kasturi_cisco@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Jun 20 2003 - 13:40:25 GMT-3
Mohit,
From the link u sent the last para of that doc itself says that using
passive-interface advertises it but does not run ISIS on it, so that's
the answer. If u configure "ip router isis" the ISIS runs on the
interface and adding passive-interface makes it redundant i think.
somene correct me if i am wrong
Good Luck,
Kasturi.
>-----Original Message----- >From: SHARMA,MOHIT (HP-Germany,ex1)
[mailto:mohit.sharma@hp.com] >Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 9:38 AM >To:
ccielab@groupstudy.com >Subject: ISIS loopback Dilemma > > >HI All, >
>One more question regarding ISIS. >If the question specifies that isis
should not send packets over loopback >interface but advertise it. >
>This link on Cisco
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/97/is-is-ip-config.html does this by
>just specifying the lo interface as passive under router isis. >However
some other labs, also do specify "ip router isis" under the lo >interface
and then make it passive. > >I have tried both ways and both seem to work
the same way. > >The question now, is- Does it make a difference if we
dont specify the ip >router isis command under the lo interface? > >And
THE GOLDEN QUESTION- Which is the best way of doing it?? THE CISCO WAY
>;-) (maybe) > >Thanks as always. > >Smiles, > >Mohit. > >
>_______________________________________________________________________
>You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group. >
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > >
>_______________________________________________________________________
>You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group. >
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take this online tour. Win an HCL Beanstalk PC. How cool can life get?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 04 2003 - 11:11:04 GMT-3