From: Larry Letterman (lletterm@cisco.com)
Date: Tue Jun 17 2003 - 13:05:12 GMT-3
What is it you really want to do here ? You seem to have a lot of
un-necessary
Issues that don't really need to be here..why the static ? Just do
routing between
The two vlans and the servers will talk to each other fine..
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
D. J. Jones
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 8:09 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: OT: vlan design question
I would like to do the following but feel that it may not work because
of how the vlans are set up.
I have a server which needs to talk to a host on one subnet via an msfc
blade in a cat6509. This server also needs to talk to another host
(with an ip alias) on the same subnet but in a different vlan. Here is
the scenario:
x.x.10.0
x.x.10.0 x.x.20.0
x.x.20.0
ServerA-----------Router (msfc)---------ServerB-----------ServerC
vlan10 vlan 10 vlan20
vlan10
vlan 20
Everything current exists in vlan 10. I want to move ServerB to vlan20
(subnet 20.0). Using my msfc, I want to point a static to ServerA which
should be no problem. The real problem will be with ServerC which is
currently in vlan10 and talks to other servers on vlan10 but not via the
msfc blade.
If I move ServerB to vlan20 AND I have ServerC in vlan10 with an
secondary ip on it's ethernet interface, will I still be able to
communicate with ServerB?
Thank you for your response.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 04 2003 - 11:10:59 GMT-3