Re: AW: dlsw and priority-list (still waiting....)

From: Hossam Mahmoud (sam6626@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Jun 15 2003 - 16:54:35 GMT-3

• Next message: Chris McCoy: "RE: dlsw and priority-list (still waiting....)"
• Previous message: John Matijevic: "interarea ospf routes"
• Maybe in reply to: Oliver Ziltener: "AW: dlsw and priority-list (still waiting....)"
• Next in thread: Jung, Jin: "RE: AW: dlsw and priority-list (still waiting....)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Oliver,
I am not so sure but here u are what the documencation says...
 
 
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/qos_r/qrdcmd3.htm#1036440
 
The dlsw, rsrb, and stun keywords refer only to direct encapsulation.
 

Oliver Ziltener <ziltener@netcloud.ch> wrote:
Hope somebody help me in this....

-----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Oliver Ziltener
Gesendet: Samstag, 14. Juni 2003 17:39
An: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc: Oliver Ziltener
Betreff: dlsw and priority-list

When I use PQ and I should give DLSW+ the highest level

should I do this

priority-list 1 protocol ip high tcp 2065

or

priority-list 1 protocol dlsw high

Or does both the same?
Is the first statement only for TCP encapsultation and the second for dlsw+
lite (llc2)

thanks for the feedback

---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!

• Next message: Chris McCoy: "RE: dlsw and priority-list (still waiting....)"
• Previous message: John Matijevic: "interarea ospf routes"
• Maybe in reply to: Oliver Ziltener: "AW: dlsw and priority-list (still waiting....)"
• Next in thread: Jung, Jin: "RE: AW: dlsw and priority-list (still waiting....)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 04 2003 - 11:10:58 GMT-3