From: Jung, Jin (jin.jung@lmco.com)
Date: Sun Jun 15 2003 - 23:21:29 GMT-3
You are correct,
The (DLSw+) traffic with TCP encapsulation:
priority-list 1 protocol ip high tcp 2065
Th DLSw+ traffic with direct encapsulation:
priority-list 1 protocol dlsw high
Jin jung...
-----Original Message-----
From: Hossam Mahmoud [mailto:sam6626@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 3:55 PM
To: Oliver Ziltener; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: AW: dlsw and priority-list (still waiting....)
Oliver,
I am not so sure but here u are what the documencation says...
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/qos_
r/qrdcmd3.htm#1036440
The dlsw, rsrb, and stun keywords refer only to direct encapsulation.
Oliver Ziltener <ziltener@netcloud.ch> wrote:
Hope somebody help me in this....
-----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Oliver Ziltener
Gesendet: Samstag, 14. Juni 2003 17:39
An: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc: Oliver Ziltener
Betreff: dlsw and priority-list
When I use PQ and I should give DLSW+ the highest level
should I do this
priority-list 1 protocol ip high tcp 2065
or
priority-list 1 protocol dlsw high
Or does both the same?
Is the first statement only for TCP encapsultation and the second for dlsw+
lite (llc2)
thanks for the feedback
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 04 2003 - 11:10:58 GMT-3