From: Tim Fletcher (tim@fletchmail.net)
Date: Tue Jun 03 2003 - 13:08:26 GMT-3
I seem to recall TAC saying that the + character is deprecated and should
not be used. I think it breaks things in later IOS versions.
At 12:37 PM 6/2/2003 -0700, CNLink Technical wrote:
>Also
>
>+(Optional) Character indicating an E.164 standard number.
>
>Be sure to read this page completely
>http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios123/123cgcr/vvfa
>x_c/int_c/dpeer_c/dp_confg.htm
>
>JC Cham
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>McCallum, Robert
>Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 6:51 AM
>To: 'Juan Manuel Munarriz Gonzalez'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: VoIP dial-peer question
>
>
>T
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Juan Manuel Munarriz Gonzalez [mailto:munarriz@satec.es]
> > Sent: 02 June 2003 13:13
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: VoIP dial-peer question
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I4ve seen in a lab test training a problem with a router with
> > two FXS ports and a VoIP dial-peer with extensisn 3002. The
> > router must be configure to reach the extensisn 3002 without
> > configuring a specified number. Beside this it asks for
> > configure E164 style.
> > Have you got any idea about such dial-peer configuration?.
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> > ____________________________________________
> >
> > Juan Manuel Munarriz Gonzalez
> > Dpto. Ingenieria de red
> > email: munarriz@satec.es
> >
> > SATEC/CONVEX
> > Avda. Europa 34 A
> > 28023 Aravaca MADRID (SPAIN)
> > Tlf.: +34 91 708 90 00 | +34 91 211 03 00
> > Fax.: +34 91 708 90 90 | +34 91 211 03 90
> > ____________________________________________
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 04 2003 - 11:10:52 GMT-3