From: Danny Andaluz (dannyandaluz@comcast.net)
Date: Mon May 26 2003 - 22:58:15 GMT-3
Exactly what I thought. Thanks.
Danny
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan V Hays" <jhays@jtan.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Cc: <Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com>
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2003 9:07 PM
Subject: RE: Dialer load-threshold question
> You are right that it does not specify 64Kbps. But common sense tells us
> that if the second channel is not yet connected, IOS must be monitoring
> the load only on the first channel. I would say that the answer is that
> "dialer load-threshold" load on a B channel is always based on 64 Kbps.
>
> HTH
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> > Behalf Of Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com
> > Sent: Monday, May 26, 2003 7:16 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Dialer load-threshold question
> >
> >
> > Hello, Group. On BRI interfaces is the dialer load threshold
> > based on 1 B channel at 64k or 2 at 128k?
> >
> > interface bri0
> > dialer load-threshold 128 either
> >
> > I would think with the above, if the first b channel reaches
> > half of the max capacity, then it should dial up the second
> > channel. This is the way I have always configured it on
> > production routers. It seems to work correctly when tested
> > with pings to the remote BRI.
> >
> > I looked at the ISDN sections on the doc CD on the website
> > and there is nothing definitive there.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Danny
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:13:48 GMT-3