From: song_kai_yuan (songky@unihub.net)
Date: Sun May 25 2003 - 06:45:34 GMT-3
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan V Hays" <jhays@jtan.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Cc: "'Re-act'" <wantingfeng@hotmail.com>
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 9:06 PM
Subject: RE: A QOS question
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> > Behalf Of Re-act
> > Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 5:55 AM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: A QOS question
> >
> >
> > If anyone would help me?
> >
> > clients--(f0/0)R1(s0/0)---FR----(s0/0)R2(f1/0)----server
> >
> > when clients access web and ftp on server,they find the speed
> > is very slow,and sometimes ftp would be disconnected,but on
> > R1 the load was not full,pls give a solution.use PQ or WRED,or FRTS?
> >
> >
>
>
> Unless the question supplied more information on CIR, access rates on
> the interfaces, and so forth, I would eliminate FRTS as a solution
> choice. Additionally, FRTS focuses more on link traffic rates and the
> statement "on R1 the load was not full" implies this is not the problem.
> Similarly, WRED is also aimed at traffic rate congestion problems
> (congestion avoidance).
>
> So my guess is Priority Queueing, if this is a multiple choice question.
> If you have other options, take a look at Custom Queueing, WFQ, and
> other congestion avoidance solutions.
>
> Reading the Doc CD's "Quality of Service Overview" would probably help
> you here because it will give you an overview of what each type of QOS
> tool accomplishes.
>
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/
> qos_c/qcdintro.htm
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:13:47 GMT-3