From: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com
Date: Wed May 21 2003 - 23:00:43 GMT-3
Thanks, Dennis. But, why does a priority of 0 cause the spokes to not take
the neighbor statement?
Danny
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Dennis [mailto:brian@labforge.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 9:55 PM
To: Andaluz, Danilo, Triaton/NA; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: OSPF question
The neighbor statements should go on the hub and not the spokes. Use the
neighbor statements on the hub and set the priority to zero on the spokes.
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
Director of CCIE Training and Development - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: brian@ipexpert.net
Toll Free: 866.225.8064
Outside U.S. & Canada: 312.321.6924
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 5:51 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: OSPF question
Hello, Group. I've been trying to find an explanation to the following on
CCO but cannot find one. Not even the OSFP design guide has it.
I have a hub and spoke frame topology. The hub has a multipoint sub
interface and the spokes are physical. The requirement is to not use IP
OSPF network commands on the interface and to make sure the hub becomes the
DR. Upon configuring a priority of 0 on the spokes, I could not configure
neighbor statements under OSPF, which would satisfy the requirement of not
using the ip ospf network command. it would take the neighbor statement,
but it would not show up in the running config. Does anyone know why a
priority of 0 does not let the neighbor statement take?
Thanks,
Danny
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:13:46 GMT-3