RE: 2950 for the 2nd switch?

From: Charles Church (cchurch@wamnet.com)
Date: Thu May 15 2003 - 09:07:24 GMT-3

• Next message: Phil Virnoche: "OT: PIX answering ARP for other IPs on segment"
• Previous message: Mhlanga Libone: "RE: CCIE written expiry ---Grace Period"
• Maybe in reply to: Aldo: "2950 for the 2nd switch?"
• Next in thread: Walker, James, IS: "RE: 2950 for the 2nd switch?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

The 2950 is much better than the 2900XLs. It's got much more QOS and
filtering capabilities.

Chuck Church
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Wam!Net Government Services
13665 Dulles Technology Dr. Ste 250
Herndon, VA 20171
Office: 703-480-2569
Cell: 585-233-2706
cchurch@wamnet.com

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Aldo
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 2:59 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: 2950 for the 2nd switch?

Hi All,

I'm shopping for the 2nd switch. I'm thinking of using 2924-XL-EN.
However I saw 2950 switch around the same price.
For those who have played with these 2 switches, my question is:
Does 2950 have all the features that 2924-XL-EN has, and therefore good for
the 2nd switch?

Thanks in advance for your 0.02
Aldo

• Next message: Phil Virnoche: "OT: PIX answering ARP for other IPs on segment"
• Previous message: Mhlanga Libone: "RE: CCIE written expiry ---Grace Period"
• Maybe in reply to: Aldo: "2950 for the 2nd switch?"
• Next in thread: Walker, James, IS: "RE: 2950 for the 2nd switch?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:13:43 GMT-3