From: huang gang (bgv@ggv.com.cn)
Date: Wed May 14 2003 - 02:30:53 GMT-3
hi,jim:
i think if you config ospf over frame relay ,the additional map is needed.if you config eigrp over frame relay,the only map to hub is enough.
huangg
email: bgv@ggv.com.cn
Tel: 010-62984668-3912
----- Original Message -----
From: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
To: "Group Study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 12:57 AM
Subject: Eigrp over Frame Relay
> Hi group,
>
> I just configured Eigrp over f/r 2 different ways -
>
> In both cases, the f/r was configured as a partial mesh, hub and spoke,
> without any subinterfaces; just physical interfaces and split horizon (the
> Eigrp version) was diabled on the hub router. Inverse Arp was also disabled
> on all F/R interfaces.
>
> In the first setup, each spoke had just one f/r map statement pointing to the
> hub router. This seemed to work fine. Each spoke was able to see the routes
> that originated from the other spokes and when you did a show ip ei neighbor
> on the spokes, you only saw the hub router.
>
> In the 2nd setup, each spoke was configured with map statements for each of
> the other spokes. Again, this seemed to work fine.
>
> Given that both configs seemed to work fine, is there any reason or benefit to
> having the additional spoke to spoke f/r map statements?
>
> I ask because in the examples I've seen of Eigrp over F/R, they have always
> had the addtional map statements and I can't figure out why that is.
>
> TIA, Jim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:13:42 GMT-3