From: Jung, Jin (jin.jung@lmco.com)
Date: Wed May 14 2003 - 09:29:58 GMT-3
Well,
I could be wrong here,
But,,
Just looking at the frame-relay, not ospf or eigrp,
Don't we need frame-relay map statements for both hub and spoke on physical
interface?
I know that we do not need the frame-relay map to spokes in
point-to-multipoint due to /32 routes.
I believe on physical interface it is best practice to have 2 frame-relay
map statements.
Frame-relay map ip 10.10.10.10 301 broad
Frame-relay map ip 10.10.10.11 301 broad.
Without even going to ospf or EIGRP.
Otherwise, I don't think you can ping the spoke to spoke.
Jin jung....
--------Original Message----- From: huang gang [mailto:bgv@ggv.com.cn] Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 1:31 AM To: ccie2be; Group Study Subject: Re: Eigrp over Frame Relay
hi,jim: i think if you config ospf over frame relay ,the additional map is needed.if you config eigrp over frame relay,the only map to hub is enough. huangg email: bgv@ggv.com.cn Tel: 010-62984668-3912 ----- Original Message ----- From: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com> To: "Group Study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 12:57 AM Subject: Eigrp over Frame Relay
> Hi group, > > I just configured Eigrp over f/r 2 different ways - > > In both cases, the f/r was configured as a partial mesh, hub and > spoke, without any subinterfaces; just physical interfaces and split > horizon (the Eigrp version) was diabled on the hub router. Inverse > Arp was also disabled on all F/R interfaces. > > In the first setup, each spoke had just one f/r map statement pointing > to the hub router. This seemed to work fine. Each spoke was able to > see the routes that originated from the other spokes and when you did > a show ip ei neighbor on the spokes, you only saw the hub router. > > In the 2nd setup, each spoke was configured with map statements for > each of the other spokes. Again, this seemed to work fine. > > Given that both configs seemed to work fine, is there any reason or > benefit to having the additional spoke to spoke f/r map statements? > > I ask because in the examples I've seen of Eigrp over F/R, they have > always had the addtional map statements and I can't figure out why > that is. > > TIA, Jim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:13:42 GMT-3