From: Jim Brown (Jim.Brown@caselogic.com)
Date: Tue May 13 2003 - 16:26:15 GMT-3
In the real world you will be paying for the extra PVC and they can be
expensive.
-----Original Message-----
From: ccie2be [mailto:ccie2be@nyc.rr.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 10:57 AM
To: Group Study
Subject: Eigrp over Frame Relay
Hi group,
I just configured Eigrp over f/r 2 different ways -
In both cases, the f/r was configured as a partial mesh, hub and spoke,
without any subinterfaces; just physical interfaces and split horizon
(the
Eigrp version) was diabled on the hub router. Inverse Arp was also
disabled
on all F/R interfaces.
In the first setup, each spoke had just one f/r map statement pointing
to the
hub router. This seemed to work fine. Each spoke was able to see the
routes
that originated from the other spokes and when you did a show ip ei
neighbor
on the spokes, you only saw the hub router.
In the 2nd setup, each spoke was configured with map statements for each
of
the other spokes. Again, this seemed to work fine.
Given that both configs seemed to work fine, is there any reason or
benefit to
having the additional spoke to spoke f/r map statements?
I ask because in the examples I've seen of Eigrp over F/R, they have
always
had the addtional map statements and I can't figure out why that is.
TIA, Jim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:13:41 GMT-3