From: Volkov, Dmitry (IDS Canada) (dmitry_volkov@ca.ml.com)
Date: Tue May 13 2003 - 14:35:27 GMT-3
When I use network statement under EIGRP process which (statement) spans
prefix I specify in static to Null (for summarization purposes)
or in static via any other interface, this static is not advertised properly
: it's going to EIGRP as Internal network with AD 90 and can not be filtered
(by means of route-map or distribution list) on the router where I do
redistribution of static.
Looks like mask length of network statement has to be < prefix length of
static route you redistribute in EIGRP.
It seems that Static via address doesn't have this limitations.
I guess it should be a good practice (as for OSPF) to specify network
statements with exact match of connected networks.
Can somebody comment it or point me to the explanation of this fact.
Thank You
Dmitry Volkov
CCIE # 10292
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:13:41 GMT-3