Redundant Route Reflectors

From: Pandora (pandoraytchan@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Apr 27 2003 - 06:35:22 GMT-3


Hi all,

What's the "correct" and "formal" configuration of redundant route
reflectors?

Suppose: Ra to Rb, Rb to Rc and Ra to Rc (fullly meshed). Does we need to
config Ra & Rb as RR? (Rc as RRC) or Just one RR and two RRC?

I also found that there're different point of view in RR Cluster in
different cisco book:

From "Cisco BGP-4 Command and Configuration Handbook" P.66
"Two RR are configured for redundancy and therefore must have the same
cluster ID"

But, from "Troubleshooting IP Routing Protocols" P.785-790,
"It's recommended that.RR should not be put in the same cluster"

Any comment of this two different point of view?

Thanks for any help.

Pandora



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:36:08 GMT-3