From: Teck PhrEAk!! (phreakinphunk@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Apr 25 2003 - 00:34:50 GMT-3
Hi,
its b'coz the trunk has not come up yet ......
>Po2 on isl not-trunking 0
are both the switches configured the same way??
if u dont have two switches....then just for testing purpose u can try an do
the trunk on the same switch.....remember its just to bring up the
trunk......try trunking between fa0/10 - 0/11 and fa0/20 - 0/21 for eg.
then give this command to check...."sh int port-channel # trunk"
REMEMBER THIS IS JUST FOR TESTING AND TO GET THE TRUNK "UP"!!
Cheers,
sumit.
>From: "Jason Cash" <cash2001@swbell.net>
>Reply-To: "Jason Cash" <cash2001@swbell.net>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: 3550- vlans allow on trunk
>Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 20:12:55 -0500
>
>I have a question about the allowed vlan (default status) on trunks. The
>Doc CD states
>"The default for all VLAN lists is to include all VLANs."
>
>Then I goto and enter the following on the switch:
>
>3550-2(config)#int port-channel 2
>3550-2(config-if)#switchport trunk allowed vlan all
>(which is the default as it doesn't show in the config:
>
>!
>interface Port-channel2
>switchport trunk encapsulation isl
>switchport mode trunk
>no ip address
>!
>
>But this output seems to contradict that:
>
>3550-2#sh int port-channel 2 trunk
>
>Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native vlan
>Po2 on isl not-trunking 0
>
>Port Vlans allowed on trunk
>Po2 none
>
>Port Vlans allowed and active in management domain
>Po2 none
>
>Port Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned
>Po2 none
>
>What is the deal? I have 10 vlans created. Shouldn't they be listed? The
>solution is similar as well.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:36:06 GMT-3