From: Wayne Hines (wayneh@DataNetDev.com.au)
Date: Thu Apr 24 2003 - 20:10:25 GMT-3
1) Should 'convert it' only refer to the mac-address and not the mask?
2) If using eg
access-list 700 permit 4000.4000.4000 0000.0000.0001
dlsw local-peer peer-id 155.100.0.1
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 155.100.0.2 dmac-output-list 700
Should canonical form be used? Note that this access-list could be used
with other non-DLSw commands.
Wayne
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
OhioHondo
Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2003 12:05
To: C.Sammarcellino@sirtisistemi.it; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: DLSW+ Icanreach DO NOT BLOCK
DLSw works with the non-canonical format. If you try to represent an
Ethernet MAC in a DLSw command, you have to convert it.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
C.Sammarcellino@sirtisistemi.it
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 8:13 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: DLSW+ Icanreach DO NOT BLOCK
If i can can reack ony the mac address 4000.4000.4000 e 4000.4000.4001 on
the fastethernet port of dlsw+
What is the correct command ?
dlsw icanreach mac-address 4000.4000.4000 mask ffff.ffff.fffe
Is it OK or it is neccesary use :
dlsw icanreach mac-address 0200.0200.0200 mask ffff.ffff.ff7f
The core of question is that : DLSW+ works with canonical on non canolical
mac format ?
Bye
Ciro
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:36:05 GMT-3