From: John Mistichelli (jmistichelli@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Apr 18 2003 - 09:12:15 GMT-3
Found a half decent tech tip on this. Hope it helps.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/tech/tk713/tk237/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800942f8.shtml
John
7536
_______________________
http://www.routopia.com
Your source for remote CCIE equipment rental. We have
ATM, ISDN, Catalyst 3550, lab scenarios and more. All
at a low low rental price. No source will give you a
more comprehensive solution at such a low price.
Guaranteed!
--- OhioHondo <ohiohondo@columbus.rr.com> wrote:
> Specifically for "Real Time" apps like voice,
> cir=mincir= (provider cir)
> (also Be=0 and Tc= 1/100 sec)
>
> To event packets from being marked with BE, "Real
> Time Apps ALWAYS need the
> relationship above.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Kip Palmer
> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 4:51 AM
> To: 'Mike Williams'; 'Joe Chang'; 'Jeongwoo Park';
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: MINCIR = CIR? (Was: Do you agree with
> this equation?)
>
>
> How about for apps that cannot tolerate delays?
> Maybe voice calcs?
> CIR is SLA. The majority of your voice frag,
> compression, etc are
> derived using the MINCIR, which is actually the
> least throughput you
> should ever get.
>
> KPalmer
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Mike Williams
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 5:45 AM
> To: 'Joe Chang'; 'Jeongwoo Park';
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: MINCIR = CIR? (Was: Do you agree with this
> equation?)
>
> I know this sounds silly, but what is the purpose of
> MINCIR??!?!
> Unless everything I've ever learned about Frame
> Relay is wrong, CIR is a
> COMMITTED Information Rate, i.e. the bandwidth
> that's guaranteed to you
> as a customer with no drops during congestion. So
> why in the world
> would you ever configure a MINCIR that's isn't
> exacly the same as your
> CIR?!?!?
>
> Any input is appreciated.
> Mike W.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Joe Chang
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 5:30 AM
> To: Jeongwoo Park; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Do you agree with this equation?
>
>
> Remember that the value of Be includes the value of
> Bc; Be is not an
> increment value over Bc.
>
> This may be more accurate:
>
> Bc = CIR * Tc
> Max Be = Access Rate * Tc
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeongwoo Park" <jpark@wams.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 6:17 AM
> Subject: Do you agree with this equation?
>
>
> > In FRTS;
> >
> > BC+BE=AP/8
> > Therefore, BE=AP/8-BC
> >
> > I would appreciate your input..
> > Thanks,
> >
> > JP
=====
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:35:57 GMT-3