From: Charles Church (cchurch@wamnet.com)
Date: Fri Apr 18 2003 - 09:05:53 GMT-3
I knew you knew what would happen, didn't want Robert to do it without
knowing the consequences. The 2950 will have a VLAN.DAT file, even though
it's a client.
Chuck Church
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Wam!Net Government Services
13665 Dulles Technology Dr. Ste 250
Herndon, VA 20171
Office: 703-480-2569
Cell: 585-233-2706
cchurch@wamnet.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Teck PhrEAk!! [mailto:phreakinphunk@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 11:10 PM
To: cchurch@wamnet.com; robert@bluespud.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: VTP updates are received but ignored?
Hi Chuck,
i was refering to a Lab environment and starting afresh with a switch
;-)...does the 2950 also have a VLAN.DAT??
cheers,
sumit.
>From: "Charles Church" <cchurch@wamnet.com>
>To: "Teck PhrEAk!!" <phreakinphunk@hotmail.com>, <robert@bluespud.com>,
><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: VTP updates are received but ignored?
>Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 10:34:03 -0400
>
>But don't delete the VLAN.DAT file on the 3550 unless absolutely necessary.
>You'll lose all the vlan names, numbers, and everything else when you do
>that. Not sure if you were referring to a production environment or a lab.
>
>Chuck Church
>CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
>Wam!Net Government Services
>13665 Dulles Technology Dr. Ste 250
>Herndon, VA 20171
>Office: 703-480-2569
>Cell: 585-233-2706
>cchurch@wamnet.com
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Teck PhrEAk!! [mailto:phreakinphunk@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 10:23 AM
>To: cchurch@wamnet.com; robert@bluespud.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: VTP updates are received but ignored?
>
>
>Robert,
>
>try this.....delete VLAN.dat on the 3550 and reboot.Not sure if the 2950
>also has a VLAN.dat....if it does delete that too....
>
>erasing the config is not enuff for the 3550...some vtp and vlan info is
>also stored in the VLAN.dat.....gotta delete that too...
>
>
>lemme know if it worked......
>
>cheers,
>
>sumit.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Charles Church" <cchurch@wamnet.com>
> >Reply-To: "Charles Church" <cchurch@wamnet.com>
> >To: "Robert Yee" <robert@bluespud.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: RE: VTP updates are received but ignored?
> >Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 08:14:04 -0400
> >
> >Robert,
> >
> > Are there any passwords defined for the domain? Are you using the same
> >trunking protocol at both ends (not sure if either supports ISL anymore).
> >Is the version number higher on the 3550? Otherwise, the client will
> >ignore
> >it, I believe.
> >
> >Chuck Church
> >CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
> >Wam!Net Government Services
> >13665 Dulles Technology Dr. Ste 250
> >Herndon, VA 20171
> >Office: 703-480-2569
> >Cell: 585-233-2706
> >cchurch@wamnet.com
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> >Robert Yee
> >Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 12:55 AM
> >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: VTP updates are received but ignored?
> >
> >
> >Hi All,
> >
> >I have 2 switches a 3550 and a 2950 that is trunked & ether-channeled
> >accross fa0/23 and fa0/24.
> >
> >The 3550 is the server and the 2950 is the slave. The vtp domain names
>are
> >identical.
> >
> >If I run 'show vtp counter', it shows that the client is receiving
>updates.
> >However, the VLANs that I add to the server is not getting sent accross
>to
> >the client.
> >
> >I have manamagent addresses on both switches in VLAN 1.
> >
> >I have probably done this 50 times in production environments with no
> >problems previously, and now I can't get it to work in a lab?
> >
> >The 'show vtp counter' indicates there are some errors:
> >
> >2950#sh vtp count
> >VTP statistics:
> >Summary advertisements received : 6
> >Subset advertisements received : 4
> >Request advertisements received : 0
> >Summary advertisements transmitted : 0
> >Subset advertisements transmitted : 0
> >Request advertisements transmitted : 4
> >Number of config revision errors : 0
> >Number of config digest errors : 4
> >Number of V1 summary errors : 0
> >
> >
> >VTP pruning statistics:
> >
> >Trunk Join Transmitted Join Received Summary advts received
> >from
> > non-pruning-capable
> >device
> >---------------- ---------------- ----------------
> >-------------------------
> >--
> >Po1 0 0 0
> >
> >Any ideas as to what I may be missing?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Robert
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:35:57 GMT-3