From: Charles Church (cchurch@wamnet.com)
Date: Thu Apr 17 2003 - 09:14:04 GMT-3
Robert,
Are there any passwords defined for the domain? Are you using the same
trunking protocol at both ends (not sure if either supports ISL anymore).
Is the version number higher on the 3550? Otherwise, the client will ignore
it, I believe.
Chuck Church
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Wam!Net Government Services
13665 Dulles Technology Dr. Ste 250
Herndon, VA 20171
Office: 703-480-2569
Cell: 585-233-2706
cchurch@wamnet.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Robert Yee
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 12:55 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: VTP updates are received but ignored?
Hi All,
I have 2 switches a 3550 and a 2950 that is trunked & ether-channeled
accross fa0/23 and fa0/24.
The 3550 is the server and the 2950 is the slave. The vtp domain names are
identical.
If I run 'show vtp counter', it shows that the client is receiving updates.
However, the VLANs that I add to the server is not getting sent accross to
the client.
I have manamagent addresses on both switches in VLAN 1.
I have probably done this 50 times in production environments with no
problems previously, and now I can't get it to work in a lab?
The 'show vtp counter' indicates there are some errors:
2950#sh vtp count
VTP statistics:
Summary advertisements received : 6
Subset advertisements received : 4
Request advertisements received : 0
Summary advertisements transmitted : 0
Subset advertisements transmitted : 0
Request advertisements transmitted : 4
Number of config revision errors : 0
Number of config digest errors : 4
Number of V1 summary errors : 0
VTP pruning statistics:
Trunk Join Transmitted Join Received Summary advts received
from
non-pruning-capable
device
---------------- ---------------- ---------------- -------------------------
-- Po1 0 0 0Any ideas as to what I may be missing?
Thanks,
Robert
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:35:55 GMT-3