From: OhioHondo (ohiohondo@columbus.rr.com)
Date: Wed Apr 16 2003 - 10:53:40 GMT-3
From what I understand, Cisco uses minCIR in the adaptive-shaping process to
define the lower limit that the to which the process is allowed to adjust. I
know Cisco's use of CIR and min-CIR, mixed in the documentation about
contracted CIR, etc., is very confusing. I'll send you a white paper on the
subject that I hope clarifies the issue.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Mike Williams
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 8:45 AM
To: 'Joe Chang'; 'Jeongwoo Park'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: MINCIR = CIR? (Was: Do you agree with this equation?)
I know this sounds silly, but what is the purpose of MINCIR??!?!
Unless everything I've ever learned about Frame Relay is wrong, CIR is a
COMMITTED Information Rate, i.e. the bandwidth that's guaranteed to you
as a customer with no drops during congestion. So why in the world
would you ever configure a MINCIR that's isn't exacly the same as your
CIR?!?!?
Any input is appreciated.
Mike W.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Joe Chang
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 5:30 AM
To: Jeongwoo Park; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Do you agree with this equation?
Remember that the value of Be includes the value of Bc; Be is not an
increment value over Bc.
This may be more accurate:
Bc = CIR * Tc
Max Be = Access Rate * Tc
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeongwoo Park" <jpark@wams.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 6:17 AM
Subject: Do you agree with this equation?
> In FRTS;
>
> BC+BE=AP/8
> Therefore, BE=AP/8-BC
>
> I would appreciate your input..
> Thanks,
>
> JP
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:35:54 GMT-3