Re: ISIS and OSPF redistrubution problem.

From: ccie_studying (ccie_studying@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Apr 13 2003 - 23:59:32 GMT-3

I think you need to do it. Because ISIS behaves different with other routing
protocols. If you don't redistribute connected, that route will not get to
known by other routers.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lin Xiaodong" <Linxiaodong@21Vianet.com>
To: "Tomikawa" <h-tomikawa@syscomusa.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2003 9:31 PM
Subject: g-e$: ISIS and OSPF redistrubution problem.

> no, you don't need to do it :)
>
>
>
> -----ee' i.d;6-----
> ed;6d::: Tomikawa [mailto:h-tomikawa@syscomusa.com]
> eif6i4: 2003e944f14f% 4:26
> f6d;6d::: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> d8;i": ISIS and OSPF redistrubution problem.
>
>
> Hi.
> I have a problem of ISIS and OSPF redistribution issue.
> ISIS and OSPF boundary router is "R1".
> ISIS is only enabled on R1's serial0 interface and OSPF is enabled on
> ether0.
> From other OSPF routers, all ISIS routes are redistributed on R1, except
> serial0 of R1 network address.
> In ISIS redistribution behavoir, Do I need to configure also
> "redistrubute connected",
> because in case of RIP or EIGRP, R1's serial0 network is redistributed
> to OSPF without
> "redistributed connected" statement.
>
> Thanks.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:35:52 GMT-3