From: Tim Fletcher (tim@fletchmail.net)
Date: Fri Apr 11 2003 - 11:48:09 GMT-3
Take a look at the output from a "sh ip bgp". Is the next hop address in
the routing table. Based on a quick read of your config, I think that may
be your problem.
-Tim Fletcher
At 07:34 AM 4/11/2003 +0200, Anesh Singh (A) wrote:
>Hi Group
>
>Need help with the BGP2RIP redituribution. I have the following
>senario:
>
> RIPv2
>
>R2-s0/0---------------serial---------------------s0-R1
> |
> |
> ATM (IBGP)
> |
> R3 (Route Reflector)
> |
> |
> serial (IBGP)
> |
> | ebgp
>ospf
>
>R4-----------------------serial----------------------R5---------------
>--seiral-------------------R6
>Between R1 and R2 running Ripv2. Between R2, R3, R4 we are running
>IBGP(no routing protocol). Between R4 &R5 running EBGP(no routingh
>protocol). Between R5 & R6, running OSPF.
>Problem: on R2 we can see the BGP routes on the BGP table, but we
>cannot see them on the ip routing table.Due to this we cannot see the
>routes on R1. The redistribution between the BGP to Rip does not work.
>this is the configs on my routers for R1 & R2:
>
>R1
> !
> int s0
> ip add 10.10.20.1 255.255.255.0
> clock rate 64000
> !
> router rip
> network 10.0.0.0
> version 2
> !
>==================================================
>
> R2
>
> int s0/0
> ip address 10.10.20.2 255.255.255.0
> !
> int atm3/0
> ip address 10.10.10.9 255.255.255.0
> !
> router bgp 5
> no synchronization
> bgp redistribute-internal
> bgp log-neighbor-changes
> redistribute connected
> redistribute rip metric 5
> neighbor 10.10.10.10 remote-as 1
> no auto-summary
> !
> router rip
> network 10.0.0.0
> version 2
> passive interface-default
> no passive interface s0
> redistribute connected
> redistribute bgp 5 metric 3
> !
>
>Can anyone please help.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:35:51 GMT-3