RE: CCIE Lab Marking

From: Brett Lewis (brett_lewis_666@msn.com)
Date: Tue Apr 08 2003 - 11:34:33 GMT-3


I did not actually answer the question.

Brett

>From: "Shahid Shafi" <sshafi@qualcomm.com>
>Reply-To: <sshafi@qualcomm.com>
>To: "'Brett Lewis'" <brett_lewis_666@msn.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: CCIE Lab Marking
>Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 07:26:24 -0700
>
>there is a difference when u say u DIDN'T complete the section bu got 100
>percent and DID complete the question assuming wrong and got 100 percent.
>Even if u think ur response is wrong but Cisco felt otherwise u ll get 100.
>They r the boss as far as this test goes!!
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>Brett Lewis
>Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 6:23 AM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: CCIE Lab Marking
>
>
>Hi,
>
>I recently took the CCIE lab in Brussels for the second time and failed. I
>don't mind failing but when I received my score report I noticed that I had
>scored 100% in areas that I knew I had not completed correctly, how did
>that
>happen I asked myself? I have asked Cisco to comment on this as I am not
>the
>only person that attended on that day that this has happenned too, I bet
>they will ask me to pay the $250 for a remark of the lab but why should I
>as
>this was their mistake to start with. I am not sure of this breaks the NDA
>and if so I am sorry please do not reply. Has this happenned to anybody
>else?
>
>Many thanks
>
>Brett
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Use MSN Messenger to send music and pics to your friends
>http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:35:49 GMT-3