From: Peng Zheng (zpnist@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Apr 07 2003 - 00:15:24 GMT-3
I tried but failed.
I noticed if the administrative distance of the IGP is
lower than 20 (Administrative distance of EBGP), it is
synchronized.
For example, if I add
ip route 192.168.194.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.237 19
, the route 192.168.194.0 is synchronized. But if I
tried:
ip route 192.168.194.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.237 21,
then the route 192.168.194.0 is not synchronized.
--- "Scott M. Livingston" <scottl@sprinthosting.net>
wrote:
> I didn't look at the example in the book before my
> response, but if I
> interpret your issue properly then I would recommend
> that you use the
> below command under your BGP config and clear your
> FIB.
>
> 'bgp redistribute-internal'
>
> hope that answers you question.
>
> thanks,
> scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Peng Zheng
> Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2003 6:16 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: BGP synchronize
>
> Hi,
>
> Routing TCPIP V2, on top of page 189. For each of
> 192.168.192.0 to 192.168.199.0, Sugarbush learn them
> from Stowe (EBGP) and Diamond (IBGP), I use
>
> For Sugarbush and Diamond, I use neighbor
> next-hop-self on for each other.
>
> For IBGP learned route, they are not synchronized.
> What I want to do is to synchronize them. Then I
> config ospf on the link between Sugarbush and
> Diamond.
> and redistribute bgp 200 subnet into ospf, but
> routes
> learned from IBGP are not synchronized. But if I
> shutdown the EBGP link ( for example, for Sugarbush,
> I
> shutdown the link between Stowe and Sugarbush),
> those
> routes are synchronized.
>
>
> Does anyone know why?
>
> Thank you for help.
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms,
> and more
> http://tax.yahoo.com
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:35:48 GMT-3