From: Mike Williams (ccie2be@swbell.net)
Date: Fri Apr 04 2003 - 00:41:46 GMT-3
Long,
I would have to agree with you that should (or does) have a system in
place for matching the configs to the test taker. Seems to me, if
nothing else, than for legal reasons they can match a candidate and
their answers and their scores. That's a very interesting idea to have
everyone print out the configs and have a signature from the candidate
and the proctor as to their ownership.
But, unfortunately, I don't see Cisco doing that. They could also
provide a complete graded version of your configs to show you for sure
why your score is what it is. But I don't see that coming anytime
either.
Mike W.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Nguyen Hoang Long
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 6:48 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Lab re-score ? has Cisco ever made any serious mistake ?
I have known that kind of Cisco's Lab behaviour & have worked with comon
Lab scenarios books for quite a long time.
There's no way to verify that the configs, which they do grade for me,
is really my configs; And there's no problem with hardware/software
malfuntions, which can cause my config in some router/switch blank.
I think of all of serious way which can make serious diferrence.
If the Exam permited everyone print-out all configs & have signatures on
it before leaving the Lab room, just make sure 100% "it is" .I would be
satisfied when fail.
Long.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andre Teku" <andre.teku@csosa.gov>
To: "'Nguyen Hoang Long'" <ng-hlong@hn.vnn.vn>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 6:10 AM
Subject: RE: Lab re-score ? has Cisco ever made any serious mistake ?
> Hi Nguyen,
>
> Did you do EVERYTHING the CISCO WAY???? Believe me, there is a "CISCO
> way" of handling/configuring labs and you must find that out. One
> more thing, someone in a not-too-distant past wrote on this forum that
> the CCIE lab
test
> is "60% INTERPRETATION and 40% CONFIGURATION". I believe this to be
> true. For most questions, the requirements are somewhat nebulous,
> with clues interspersed here and there - You must read everything very
> carefully and ask the proctor when things aren't clear enough. Of
> course doing this also cut down on your time...
>
> Anyway, "Hang in there" and just concentrate on your next shot.
>
> Andre T.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nguyen Hoang Long [mailto:ng-hlong@hn.vnn.vn]
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 2:10 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Lab re-score ? has Cisco ever made any serious mistake ?
>
>
> Hi Group,
>
> I just failed my lab, although that's quite a shock for me, but more
> than that is the score of only about 40% with three portions came up
> with ZERO % Having almost 4 hours for double check this time, already
> taking my 1st attempt is 3 months ago, so let's not talk about things
> such as Lab's english
> wordings, Behaviour of Grading system,......, I'm familiar with those
!
>
> What I'm having doubts here is if Cisco has ever made any serious
> mistake (like mistake my Lab with someone other, mistake in retrieving
> process for some router's config,..... any that can make significant
> diferrences)
>
> There's no way to verify that without requesting for a re-grade.
> But...Someone told me regrading Lab is just a wast of money,
> especially
with
> my very low score.
>
> Anyone has experience, I'm seeking your advice.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Rgds,
> Long.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:35:46 GMT-3