From: Paul Lalonde (plalonde2@cogeco.ca)
Date: Thu Apr 03 2003 - 22:45:14 GMT-3
Hi,
After my first attempt, I was initially inclined to believe that the scoring
of my lab was inaccurate. However, over the next 24 hours I began to realize
where I had, in fact, incorrectly interpreted the questions. In hindsight, I
had simply misinterpreted the questions and realized what the real answer
should have been. Or, I realized where I might have missed a configuration.
Ask yourself if you really understood what the questions were asking. In my
case, I had a lot of time to think about my exam afterwards, and the real
answers became obvious.
In short, a candidate will know when they're best-prepared when they can
figure out what the answers to the questions should have been. By the time
you take your next exam, you will have a much larger assortment of tools
upon which to draw.
Regards,
Paul Lalonde
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nguyen Hoang Long" <ng-hlong@hn.vnn.vn>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 2:10 PM
Subject: Lab re-score ? has Cisco ever made any serious mistake ?
> Hi Group,
>
> I just failed my lab, although that's quite a shock for me, but more than
that
> is the score of only about 40% with three portions came up with ZERO %
> Having almost 4 hours for double check this time, already taking my 1st
> attempt is 3 months ago, so let's not talk about things such as Lab's
english
> wordings, Behaviour of Grading system,......, I'm familiar with those !
>
> What I'm having doubts here is if Cisco has ever made any serious mistake
> (like mistake my Lab with someone other, mistake in retrieving process for
> some router's config,..... any that can make significant diferrences)
>
> There's no way to verify that without requesting for a re-grade.
> But...Someone told me regrading Lab is just a wast of money, especially
with
> my very low score.
>
> Anyone has experience, I'm seeking your advice.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Rgds,
> Long.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:35:46 GMT-3