From: Abdul Waheed Ghaffar (a_w_ghaffar@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Mar 31 2003 - 03:42:59 GMT-3
What i think is of 128K is not correct when we use % bandwidth, we should
use 100 ( provided max-reserver-bandwidth is 100 %) ...bcoz we are
calculating on the basis of % of bandwidth not on actual....please comment.
>From: tria_ka@gmx.net
>Reply-To: tria_ka@gmx.net
>To: "Ciscolab" <ciscolab@vip.sina.com>
>CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: RE: QOS
>Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 07:57:13 +0200 (MEST)
>
>maybe there is a mistake .
>
>so what about the class DNS ?
>my solution is:
>
>1500(defaultvalue) / 11500 *128 = 16.7 * 0.75 = 2.5
>
>==> is this the value that i nee for
>class DNS
> bandwidth 12.5 and not 16 !!???
> queue-limit 100
>
>
>th anks to all
>
>udo
>
>
> > ======= 2003-03-27 13:21:00 DzTZ@4PEVPP45@#:=======
> >
> > >Hi Scott,
> > >
> > >If I may, I wouldn't allocate 100 of the bandwidth to the classes and
> > >would keep the default to 75 . If you want to assign more than 75 to
> > >the classes, that's fine but not up to 100.
> > >
> > >In other words, I'd rather use this formula for queue #1:
> > >128 kbps * (1000/11500) * 0.75 = 8 (bandwidth 8)
> > >In percentage, this gives us:
> > >(1000/11500) * 0.75 = 6.5 (bandwidth percent 6)
> > >
> > >May be I am missing something here so any input?
> > >
> > >Fabrice
> > >http://www.6colabs.com
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > >Scott M. Livingston
> > >Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 8:01 PM
> > >To: 'Abdul Waheed Ghaffar'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > >Subject: RE: QOS
> > >
> > >Here is my attempt. For these scenarios if I can spot the bandwidth
> > >percent real quick then I just use the 'bandwidth percent' command. In
> > >my own freakish way of thinking I can convert it quicker using the
> > >formula below. Tell me what you all think and please let me know if I
> > >messed up somewhere.
> > >
> > >BW of Link in kbps * (byte count / total byte count) = BW
> > >
> > >For example:
> > >
> > >Queue #1
> > >---------
> > >128 kbps * (1000 / 11500) = 11
> > >
> > >!
> > >class-map match-all TELNET
> > > match protocol telnet
> > >class-map match-all DLSW
> > > match protocol dlsw
> > >class-map match-all FTP
> > > match protocol ftp
> > >class-map match-all DNS
> > > match protocol dns
> > >!
> > >policy-map MORE-FUN
> > > class TELNET
> > > bandwidth 11
> > > queue-limit 100
> > > class DNS
> > > bandwidth 16
> > > queue-limit 100
> > > class FTP
> > > bandwidth 33
> > > queue-limit 20
> > > class DLSW
> > > bandwidth 55
> > > queue-limit 20
> > > class class-default
> > > bandwidth 11
> > > queue-limit 20
> > >!
> > >
> > >thank you,
> > >scott
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > >Abdul Waheed Ghaffar
> > >Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 7:04 AM
> > >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > >Subject: QOS
> > >
> > >Hi group,
> > >
> > >I need to convert following CQ into CBWFQ
> > ># queue-list 1 protocol tcp 1 telnet byte-count 1000 limit 100
> > ># queue-list 1 protocol udp 2 domain limit 100
> > ># queue-list 1 protocol tcp 3 ftp byte-count 3000
> > ># queue-list 1 protocol dlsw 4 byte-count 5000
> > ># queue-list 1 default 16 byte-count 1000
> > ># interface serial 0/1
> > ># custom-queue-list 1
> > >
> > >can any body giude me...the serial interface is frame-relay
>encapsulated
> > >
> > >....will i map the service on physical interface or under class-map
> > >frame-relay?
> > >
> > >thanks in advance
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >_________________________________________________________________
> > >The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
> > >http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> >
> > = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
> >
> >
> > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!VB
> > @q#!
> >
> >
> > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Ciscolab
> > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ciscolab@vip.sina.com
> > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!2003-03-30
> >
>
>--
>+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++
>Bitte ldcheln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:47 GMT-3