From: tria_ka@gmx.net
Date: Mon Mar 31 2003 - 05:34:02 GMT-3
o.k. i understand what u mean.
so we are calculating on 0.75 * 128 kb with the percent command !
regards
udo
> What i think is of 128K is not correct when we use % bandwidth, we should
> use 100 ( provided max-reserver-bandwidth is 100 %) ...bcoz we are
> calculating on the basis of % of bandwidth not on actual....please
> comment.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: tria_ka@gmx.net
> >Reply-To: tria_ka@gmx.net
> >To: "Ciscolab" <ciscolab@vip.sina.com>
> >CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: Re: RE: QOS
> >Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 07:57:13 +0200 (MEST)
> >
> >maybe there is a mistake .
> >
> >so what about the class DNS ?
> >my solution is:
> >
> >1500(defaultvalue) / 11500 *128 = 16.7 * 0.75 = 2.5
> >
> >==> is this the value that i nee for
> >class DNS
> > bandwidth 12.5 and not 16 !!???
> > queue-limit 100
> >
> >
> >th anks to all
> >
> >udo
> >
> >
> > > ======= 2003-03-27 13:21:00 DzTZ@4PEVPP45@#:=======
> > >
> > > >Hi Scott,
> > > >
> > > >If I may, I wouldn't allocate 100 of the bandwidth to the classes and
> > > >would keep the default to 75 . If you want to assign more than 75 to
> > > >the classes, that's fine but not up to 100.
> > > >
> > > >In other words, I'd rather use this formula for queue #1:
> > > >128 kbps * (1000/11500) * 0.75 = 8 (bandwidth 8)
> > > >In percentage, this gives us:
> > > >(1000/11500) * 0.75 = 6.5 (bandwidth percent 6)
> > > >
> > > >May be I am missing something here so any input?
> > > >
> > > >Fabrice
> > > >http://www.6colabs.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > > >Scott M. Livingston
> > > >Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 8:01 PM
> > > >To: 'Abdul Waheed Ghaffar'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > >Subject: RE: QOS
> > > >
> > > >Here is my attempt. For these scenarios if I can spot the bandwidth
> > > >percent real quick then I just use the 'bandwidth percent' command.
> In
> > > >my own freakish way of thinking I can convert it quicker using the
> > > >formula below. Tell me what you all think and please let me know if I
> > > >messed up somewhere.
> > > >
> > > >BW of Link in kbps * (byte count / total byte count) = BW
> > > >
> > > >For example:
> > > >
> > > >Queue #1
> > > >---------
> > > >128 kbps * (1000 / 11500) = 11
> > > >
> > > >!
> > > >class-map match-all TELNET
> > > > match protocol telnet
> > > >class-map match-all DLSW
> > > > match protocol dlsw
> > > >class-map match-all FTP
> > > > match protocol ftp
> > > >class-map match-all DNS
> > > > match protocol dns
> > > >!
> > > >policy-map MORE-FUN
> > > > class TELNET
> > > > bandwidth 11
> > > > queue-limit 100
> > > > class DNS
> > > > bandwidth 16
> > > > queue-limit 100
> > > > class FTP
> > > > bandwidth 33
> > > > queue-limit 20
> > > > class DLSW
> > > > bandwidth 55
> > > > queue-limit 20
> > > > class class-default
> > > > bandwidth 11
> > > > queue-limit 20
> > > >!
> > > >
> > > >thank you,
> > > >scott
> > > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > > >Abdul Waheed Ghaffar
> > > >Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 7:04 AM
> > > >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > >Subject: QOS
> > > >
> > > >Hi group,
> > > >
> > > >I need to convert following CQ into CBWFQ
> > > ># queue-list 1 protocol tcp 1 telnet byte-count 1000 limit 100
> > > ># queue-list 1 protocol udp 2 domain limit 100
> > > ># queue-list 1 protocol tcp 3 ftp byte-count 3000
> > > ># queue-list 1 protocol dlsw 4 byte-count 5000
> > > ># queue-list 1 default 16 byte-count 1000
> > > ># interface serial 0/1
> > > ># custom-queue-list 1
> > > >
> > > >can any body giude me...the serial interface is frame-relay
> >encapsulated
> > > >
> > > >....will i map the service on physical interface or under class-map
> > > >frame-relay?
> > > >
> > > >thanks in advance
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >_________________________________________________________________
> > > >The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
> > > >http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> > >
> > > = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
> > >
> > >
> > > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!VB
> > > @q#!
> > >
> > >
> > > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Ciscolab
> > > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ciscolab@vip.sina.com
> > > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!2003-03-30
> > >
> >
> >--
> >+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++
> >Bitte ldcheln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage!
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>
-- +++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++ Bitte ldcheln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:47 GMT-3