From: Teck PhrEAk!! (phreakinphunk@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Mar 26 2003 - 14:32:03 GMT-3
for furthur info....refer TCP/IP VOL 1 chapter 11.
cheers,
sumit ahuja
ccie#11125
ccnp,ccdp,rhce,scsa,mcse,ibm e-biz.
this behaviour is same for all the routing protocols.....though ISIS has
some redistribution issue....but thats somethin' else.
>From: Connie Nie <CNie@EPLUS.com>
>Reply-To: Connie Nie <CNie@EPLUS.com>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: redistribution question
>Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 10:20:06 -0500
>
>Hi, group.
>
>I used to think that when redistributing, for example from eigrp to ospf,
>the routes have to exist in the routing table as an eigrp routes for it to
>be redistributed, so I usually just put in redistribute connected without
>thinking. Now playing with the lab, I notice that is not true. Directly
>connected interfaces running eigrp process is also redistributed. Same is
>true for ospf. ----- And that confuses me. So when redistribution happens,
>again using eigrp to ospf as an example, the router takes the whole eigrp's
>topology database and inject it into ospf database? Does the behavior vary
>from protocol to protocol? Does the redistribution process refer to the
>routing table at all? Can someone clarify that for me? I would really
>appreciate it.
>
>Regards,
>Connie
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:44 GMT-3