From: Teck PhrEAk!! (phreakinphunk@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Mar 26 2003 - 14:30:46 GMT-3
hey,
will explain in short....i mean realll short....will also assume yr example
of ospf>eigrp and eigrp>ospf.....when redistributing eigrp to ospf all the
routes that u see marked with "D" in yr routing table will be distributed
into ospf.......and similarly for redistributing ospf into eigrp all the
routes learned by ospf will be injected into the eigrp domain......
now about redistributing connected........say u have 4 serial interfaces on
the router and u have configured only s0/0 to participate in the ospf
process.now, u want ospf to learn about the remaining 3 serial interfaces
actually running ospf on it.....this is when u use redistribute connected,
i.e all yr connected interfaces will also be reditributed into ospf.....to
be slective about the interfaces to be distributed use route maps.
hmm....thats all folks.
cheers,
sumit ahuja
ccie#11125
ccnp,ccdp,rhce,scsa,mcse,ibm e-biz.
this behaviour is same for all the routing protocols.....though ISIS has
some redistribution issue....but thats somethin' else.
>From: Connie Nie <CNie@EPLUS.com>
>Reply-To: Connie Nie <CNie@EPLUS.com>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: redistribution question
>Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 10:20:06 -0500
>
>Hi, group.
>
>I used to think that when redistributing, for example from eigrp to ospf,
>the routes have to exist in the routing table as an eigrp routes for it to
>be redistributed, so I usually just put in redistribute connected without
>thinking. Now playing with the lab, I notice that is not true. Directly
>connected interfaces running eigrp process is also redistributed. Same is
>true for ospf. ----- And that confuses me. So when redistribution happens,
>again using eigrp to ospf as an example, the router takes the whole eigrp's
>topology database and inject it into ospf database? Does the behavior vary
>from protocol to protocol? Does the redistribution process refer to the
>routing table at all? Can someone clarify that for me? I would really
>appreciate it.
>
>Regards,
>Connie
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:45 GMT-3