From: Teck PhrEAk!! (phreakinphunk@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Mar 26 2003 - 10:59:02 GMT-3
yes...the default value is that of 1500 bytes. ;-)
cheers,
sumit p ahuja
ccie#11125
ccdp,ccnp,rhce,scsa,mcse,ibm e-biz pro.
>From: tria_ka@gmx.net
>Reply-To: tria_ka@gmx.net
>To: "FATHALLAH" <sfathallah@mail.cbi.net.ma>
>CC: a_w_ghaffar@hotmail.com, ccielab@groupstudy.com, lileikis@yahoo.com
>Subject: RE: QOS
>Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 08:36:15 +0100 (MET)
>
>hi ,
>
>now i'm really confused about this two techniques.
>
>please can u explain what happens if any queue-list command have no byte
>count given.
>is there any default value ?
>
>thanks
>
>udo
>
> > The CQ and CBWFQ are diffrent omplementation of bandwith reservation, it
> > is
> > not possible to apply the two technique to the same interface.if you
>don't
> > have precision of the technologie to use in the LAB, it is mach easy to
> > use
> > CBWFQ. but be carefull the two technologie have diffrentes way of
>bandwith
> > calculation.CQ calculation take into account the packet size.
> > I think "gary lileikis" give the good config, but without the correct
> > bandwith percent.
> > the total bandwith reserved in your byte count is 10000 bytes, so FTP
>wil
> > get 30%, dlsw 50%,telnet 10% and default 10%. and you don't need to
>reseve
> > more maximum bandwith than default ( 75%).
> >
> > Good luck.
> >
> > Said FATHALF
> >
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]De la part de
> > Abdul Waheed Ghaffar
> > Envoyi : lundi 24 mars 2003 13:04
> > @ : ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Objet : QOS
> >
> >
> > Hi group,
> >
> > I need to convert following CQ into CBWFQ
> > # queue-list 1 protocol tcp 1 telnet byte-count 1000 limit 100
> > # queue-list 1 protocol udp 2 domain limit 100
> > # queue-list 1 protocol tcp 3 ftp byte-count 3000
> > # queue-list 1 protocol dlsw 4 byte-count 5000
> > # queue-list 1 default 16 byte-count 1000
> > # interface serial 0/1
> > # custom-queue-list 1
> >
> > can any body giude me...the serial interface is frame-relay encapsulated
> > ...will i map the service on physical interface or under class-map
> > frame-relay?
> >
> > thanks in advance
> >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
> > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> >
>
>--
>+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++
>Bitte ldcheln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:44 GMT-3