RE: QOS

From: Colin Barber (Colin.Barber@telewest.co.uk)
Date: Tue Mar 25 2003 - 06:00:40 GMT-3


Do you need NBAR configured to match Telnet and FTP? I know you can match
whole protocol suites without NBAR e.g. IPX, IP etc.

Colin

-----Original Message-----
From: ANDF@nnpi.com [mailto:ANDF@nnpi.com]
Sent: 24 March 2003 19:39
To: lileikis@yahoo.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com; PBrown4@chartercom.com
Subject: RE: QOS

Gary/Patrick,

I didn't know that you could use MATCH PROTOCOL TELNET/DLSW/FTP etc with
CLASS-MAPs. I thought you needed an access-list to match Telnet/DLSW/FTP
traffic. Which version of the IOS are you using?

Andy

-----Original Message-----
From: gary lileikis [mailto:lileikis@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 11:48 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE:QOS

How about this?

class-map match-all domain
  match access-group 105
class-map match-all telnet
  match protocol telnet
class-map match-all dlsw
  match protocol dlsw
class-map match-all ftp
  match protocol ftp

policy-map mypolicy
  class telnet
   bandwidth percent 9
   queue-limit 100
  class domain
   bandwidth percent 13
   queue-limit 100
  class ftp
   bandwidth percent 26
   queue-limit 20
  class dlsw
   bandwidth percent 43
   queue-limit 20
  class class-default
   bandwidth percent 9
   queue-limit 20

access-list 105 permit udp any any eq domain

interface Serial0/1
 bandwidth 128
 encapsulation frame-relay
 max-reserved-bandwidth 100
 service-policy output mypolicy

Gary Lileikis

-----Original Message-----
From: Abdul Waheed Ghaffar
[mailto:a_w_ghaffar@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 8:04 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: QOS

Hi group,

I need to convert following CQ into CBWFQ
# queue-list 1 protocol tcp 1 telnet byte-count 1000
limit 100
# queue-list 1 protocol udp 2 domain limit 100
# queue-list 1 protocol tcp 3 ftp byte-count 3000
# queue-list 1 protocol dlsw 4 byte-count 5000
# queue-list 1 default 16 byte-count 1000
# interface serial 0/1
# custom-queue-list 1

can any body giude me...the serial interface is
frame-relay encapsulated
...will i map the service on physical interface or
under class-map
frame-relay?

thanks in advance



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:44 GMT-3