From: Donny MATEO (donny.mateo@sg.ca-indosuez.com)
Date: Tue Mar 25 2003 - 00:07:21 GMT-3
Another fact to add, I received my number on 3rd of March. and somehow, I saw a mail from another guy who did the test 3 - 4 days after me and got a lower number than mine.
Perhaps this number thing is assigned per region, like an NAT pool or something that is preallocated. So the new number that showed up in the list doesn't necessarily means that the other pool on the other testing center has been fully used. In networking
term = discontiguous ; - )
Donny
Peter van Oene
<pvo@usermail.com To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: The number of CCIEs grows faster today
nobody@groupstudy
.com
25-03-2003 10:01
Please respond to
Peter van Oene
At 05:28 AM 3/25/2003 +0700, Phong Tran Tien wrote:
>Hi group,
>
>I see the truth that the number of CCIEs grows faster today than before. I
>took and passed the lab on 19 March, got the number #11285 and I notice
>that Mr Ozan Ocal, CCIE #11318, got his number on 22 March. It means that
>we have about 33 new CCIEs (11318-11285) in only 3 days (19 to 22 March).
>Someone told me that the number of new CCIEs is 400 each month this year,
>is it true? If it is true, in this year we will have about new 4,800 CCIEs.
>
>The CCIE program started in 1994 and up to this time, it's about 10 years
>long, and the total number of CCIEs in the world is now about 10,300 (the
>first CCIE got number 1025). It means that on average the number of CCIEs
>grows 1,030 each year (10,300/10). But compare with the number above,
>4,800 this year, how do you think? Does this mean that, when the number of
>CCIEs increases faster, CCIE certification is easier to get and the value
>of the certification decreases?
This drives me nuts. In 93/94 or whenever the program launched, very
little folks knew about it. Since then, it has become more and more well
known and thus more and more folks have decided to attack it. Further, the
amount of study material has grown exponentially since then. Of course the
rate of certification is higher now: it has to be.
Expecting that the rate would remain consistent would mean that the degree
of difficultly would need to rise in line with demand. Is this fair? Even
so, what would it represent? Ideally, the program is meant to certify
those folks who are adept at dealing with IOS in its many favours and
various network topologies. If more folks decide to learn these skills,
then more folks should become certified. We shouldn't make the test harder
just to stem the rate of growth.
Just because you passed a test, lab or otherwise, doesn't mean you are
worth a six figure salary. If you haven't figured that out, you might want
to study a little longer and realize that there is more to business than
rapidly building weird networks in short periods of time.
Pete
>
>Tran Tien Phong
>CCIE #11285
This message is for information purposes only and its content
should not be construed as an offer, or solicitation of an offer,
to buy or sell any banking or financial instruments or services
and no representation or warranty is given in respect of its
accuracy, completeness or fairness. The material is subject
to change without notice. You should take your own independent
tax, legal and other professional advice in respect of the content
of this message. This message may contain confidential or
legally privileged material and may not be copied, redistributed
or published (in whole or in part) without our prior written consent.
This email may have been intercepted, partially destroyed,
arrive late, incomplete or contain viruses and no liability is
accepted by any member of the Credit Agricole Indosuez group
as a result. If you are not the intended recipient of this message,
please immediately notify the sender and delete this message
from your computer.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:44 GMT-3