RE: CQ for DLSW

From: CCIE FUN (ccieexam2002@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat Mar 15 2003 - 00:12:09 GMT-3

• Next message: rusdi junaidi: "OOT: VoIP E1 to FXS"
• Previous message: Peter van Oene: "OT: Re: Does Cisco offer Catalyst equivalent of 3Com XRN?"
• Maybe in reply to: Janto Cin: "CQ for DLSW"
• Next in thread: Janto Cin: "Re: CQ for DLSW"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I think for TCP encapsulation you can't use
queue-list 1 protocol dlsw 1.
It is recommended this option should be used only if
you are using Direct encapsulation.

It is suggested the queue-list 1 protocol ip list 101
option if you are using TCP.

access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 2065
access-list 101 permit tcp any eq 2065 any
access-list 101 permit udp any any eq 2067
access-list 101 permit tcp any eq 2067 any
access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 1981
access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 1982
access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 1983

--- FATHALLAH <sfathallah@mail.cbi.net.ma> wrote:
> Yes.
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]De la part de
> Janto Cin
> Envoyi : vendredi 14 mars 2003 11:40
> @ : ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Objet : CQ for DLSW
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> Can I just use 'queue-list 1 protocol dlsw 1' rather
> than 'queue-list 1
> protocol ip list 101' then create acl 101 for dlsw?
> TIA,
> Janto

• Next message: rusdi junaidi: "OOT: VoIP E1 to FXS"
• Previous message: Peter van Oene: "OT: Re: Does Cisco offer Catalyst equivalent of 3Com XRN?"
• Maybe in reply to: Janto Cin: "CQ for DLSW"
• Next in thread: Janto Cin: "Re: CQ for DLSW"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:40 GMT-3