From: Janto Cin (jantocin@datacomm.co.id)
Date: Sat Mar 15 2003 - 00:17:20 GMT-3
I got it.
Thank you all for your help.
Janto
----- Original Message -----
From: "Songbin Wei" <sbwei_2000@yahoo.com>
To: "FATHALLAH" <sfathallah@mail.cbi.net.ma>; "Janto Cin"
<jantocin@datacomm.co.id>
Cc: "Ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 8:47 AM
Subject: RE: CQ for DLSW
> No. They have different meaning. The 'protocol dlsw'
> means the protocol field is 'dlsw', which is true only
> when you use direct encap. When use tcp encap,
> however, dlsw is nothing but tcp traffic so you need
> to create an ACL to match all relevant tcp ports such
> as:
> (the basic one)
> access-list 110 permit tcp any eq 2065 any
> access-list 110 permit tcp any any eq 2065
> (when you use dlsw priority, add the following lines:)
> access-list 110 permit tcp any any eq 2067
> access-list 110 permit tcp any any eq 1981
> access-list 110 permit tcp any any eq 1982
> access-list 110 permit tcp any any eq 1983
>
> --- FATHALLAH <sfathallah@mail.cbi.net.ma> wrote:
> > Yes.
> >
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : nobody@groupstudy.com
> > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]De la part de
> > Janto Cin
> > Envoyi : vendredi 14 mars 2003 11:40
> > @ : ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Objet : CQ for DLSW
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Can I just use 'queue-list 1 protocol dlsw 1' rather
> > than 'queue-list 1
> > protocol ip list 101' then create acl 101 for dlsw?
> > TIA,
> > Janto
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:40 GMT-3