From: Scott M. Livingston (scottl@sprinthosting.net)
Date: Thu Mar 13 2003 - 09:08:28 GMT-3
The other school of thought is that they will NOT take off points for
using 'no auto-summary' unless they in some manner tell you not to use
it. Keep in mind they may tell you not to use indirectly; this applies
to anything.
If you don't lose points for it then use it, it might save you from
losing points when you go to redistribute something. This is certainly
not the rule I apply to everything, but it's the path I have chosen for
'no auto-summary'.
Thanks,
scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
mdye@bevillcntr.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 11:28 PM
To: Voss, David; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: Re: No Auto-Summary
I would say, if it will correctly summarize with auto-summary, then
leave
it on. If it is summarizing outside of what is being ask, turn it off
and
use manual summarization.
That is my 2 cents.
At 09:07 PM 3/12/03 -0600, Voss, David wrote:
>I always use "no auto-summary" when doing labs even if not asked to do
so.
>My IGP scores in my lab make me wonder if it costs me points to do this
when
>not told to do it.
>
>Any general consensus on this? Do most of you wait to be told to do
this
>before turning this feature off?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:38 GMT-3