From: Jonathan V Hays (jhays@jtan.com)
Date: Wed Mar 12 2003 - 13:40:00 GMT-3
Chuck,
That makes sense. (I wish everyone would communicate as clearly! ;-)
Thanks!!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf Of Charles Church
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 9:38 PM
> To: ccielab
> Subject: RE: Qs about Frame Relay end-to-end keepalive
>
>
> Jonathan,
>
> I think they're talking about watching the route to the
> loopback on the other router. If the other router becomes
> unreachable, then the route to that loopback network
> disappears and dialer watch goes to work. Watching the route
> to your own loopback would make no sense.
>
> Chuck Church
> CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
> Wam!Net Government Services
> 13600 EDS Dr.
> Herndon, VA 20171
> cell 585-233-2706
> cchurch@wamnet.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan V Hays [mailto:jhays@jtan.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 9:51 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Qs about Frame Relay end-to-end keepalive
>
>
> Watch the loopback??
>
> Think about this for a minute. A loopback interface is
> *always* up. Since it will never go down how will it ever
> trigger a call?
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]
> On Behalf
> > Of Janto Cin
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 1:02 AM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: Qs about Frame Relay end-to-end keepalive
> >
> >
> > What route to watch? Can we just watch loopback at R2?
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jun Qian" <johnjunqian@yahoo.com>
> > To: "Tran Tien Phong" <PhongTT2@FPT.COM.VN>;
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 8:35 AM
> > Subject: Re: Qs about Frame Relay end-to-end keepalive
> >
> >
> > > I suggest that you use "dial-watch" for this case.
> > >
> > > Jun
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:38 GMT-3