From: DougAtHome (dcalton@fuse.net)
Date: Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:24:28 GMT-3
I believe that would be fine - in fact, in some sense, it might be ideal.
Dialer-watch is not watching whether the interface is down, but whether a
route to a network is down. Being a loopback, the only way for the route to
disappear is if connectivity to the source router is interrupted, i.e. the
serial link.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan V Hays [mailto:jhays@jtan.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 9:51 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Qs about Frame Relay end-to-end keepalive
Watch the loopback??
Think about this for a minute. A loopback interface is *always* up.
Since it will never go down how will it ever trigger a call?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf Of Janto Cin
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 1:02 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Qs about Frame Relay end-to-end keepalive
>
>
> What route to watch? Can we just watch loopback at R2?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jun Qian" <johnjunqian@yahoo.com>
> To: "Tran Tien Phong" <PhongTT2@FPT.COM.VN>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 8:35 AM
> Subject: Re: Qs about Frame Relay end-to-end keepalive
>
>
> > I suggest that you use "dial-watch" for this case.
> >
> > Jun
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:37 GMT-3